India should

 

Meaning India should remain Hindu because everyone in the world believes that Hindus are proficient in mathematics. Numbers will be concerned about the protection of people having devotion? There is no other side of Bharat-Tattva, we have given that Hindus are proficient in reason. We calculated the value of Anku before Pythagoras. That's why we may have been able to save • account of our decline. We can tell right away how many Hindus in this Indian subcontinent, now called the weary and non-Indian Indians, the vast South Asia, 100 years ago, how many are now decreasing, if the same rate continues for the next 20, 40 and 60 years. How few Hindus will be reduced in India and in what year will they eventually become a minority to be displayed in a museum? All this when there are Hindus in every field and at every level to say it. Look at Vijay Mallya, the world's most opulent and luxurious yacht he has bought called the Indian Princess. The price is above 100 crores, one of the five richest and opulent people in the world is a Hindu Lakshminivas Mittal. Hardly any such big company in the world would be involved in engineering, computer or finance management, which does not have a Hindu active as its chairman or main engine. But what is the condition of Hindus? Hindu temples, Hindu pilgrimage centers, Sanskrit schools and Veda schools? Leave it, if the number of Hindus decreases in the entire Indian subcontinent, then who gets hurt? Vivekananda's portrait was removed from the Nehru Yuva Kendra, religious symbols were banned in the army, Haj was promoted and Kailash Yatra was silenced, buses to Muzaffarabad were taken but Hindu temples in Jammu were taken over and Only Hindus attacked Shankaracharya. Organizations associated with Hindutva continued to receive reprimands from America and ignoring it, the same Hindus continued to polish their booty, who were the likhta jigar and noore extreme of that government, which the American newspapers kept calling Hindu nationalist. And it was the Hindus who were at the forefront of saying what would happen if Hindus became a minority in India itself, 'Our mixed culture will shine with the brilliance of Islam. It was and are Hindus who have not yet realized what it means to lose Tibet. Those who do not even know where Lhasa is and in which region the rivers that irrigate our entire eastern world have their origin. Where is the world's largest water reservoir and how little is the gap between reaching Kailas Mansarovar and Indus river and not being able to go. Can you expect from him that he is a young victory over Hinduism and the symbols of that religion and those symbols? And if the Creator has produced him in a Hindu house, then he should be worried that what does it mean to be a Hindu, not an accident but a responsibility. The Hindu who worships Durga but kills the goddess in the womb, The Hindu who is photographed on Chhath worshiping in the Ganges-Yamuna by standing in waist-deep water, takes care of cows in the backyard of a government bungalow, calls himself a Yaduvanshi It says, when a decree blaming the killers of Hindus in the air for the sake of votes and distributing bread with the cow killers, injuring the indigenous religion with foreign money, then the religion of that Hindu is not associated with the country. No . His religion should be associated with the country and become the national religion, for him India should not only be a land of stones, rivers and forests, but a place of reverence for Jagajjanani, who is alive in the form of Bhavani Bharati, hence gave the mantra to make the nation all-powerful. Hedgewar. Which was explained in the personality and deeds of Param Pujya Shri Guruji. But as much as the work remains to be done, every day more difficulties come to the fore and they mostly arise from the shortcomings within ourselves and the misunderstandings of our own society. Even today most of the Hindu society either does not understand our concept of Hindutva or is opposed to it. Can we set a goal for ourselves that how and by when we will reach the nearest to our desired by taking all the Hindus together? We appreciate our culture and civilization by saying that no Galileans were ever punished here for any of their beliefs. That is why it is also necessary that we are not tempted to label every anti-Hinduism as anti-national and remember that Dr. ji had said that the most brilliant genius in the society and the one who is our most staunch opponent, we should do our best. Emphasis should be placed on how to bring things together by explaining the matter. But many times it seems that while flowing in our own light, we are becoming proficient in the art of making those who are not our own, far from making those who are not ours from the frame of 'we are all wrong'. So whenever in doubt, read Shri Guruji again and again, Dr. If you contemplate the life of ji, then the fog of illusions will also go away and your real image will also be visible in that mirror. Then we can ask ourselves before pointing fingers at others, do we talk of Hindutva? That Hindutva, whose followers cannot keep the places of worship of their gods and goddesses ie temples clean. Chaitra Shukla 2. Woe .

Whose followers kill the most cows and send their mass abroad, which is so submissive that they make friends with America and then eat slap.  These are the same Hindus who mobilize facilities for their own conversion and are happy by giving donations from their companies to non-Hindu organizations for anti-Hindu works.  These Hindus never studied their theology and history, but read Shakespeare, Lincoln's verse and considered East Asia illuminated by Hindu culture as if it was not on the map.  And then tied his writings, awards, lifestyle and manners to the pegs of the West.  If the dog of these western countries also dies, then news is made in the English newspapers of Delhi.  But do not print two lines about any great writer of Indian language and big leaders of East Asian countries.  Think, when Multan would have collapsed or Taxila would have been looted, then what is the difference between the Hindus of that time and the Hindus of today.  Equally mutual jealousy over splendor, opulence, self-enchantment and limitless knowledge, an insatiable longing to put each other down, to be humiliated.  Result ?  There may be some signs of being a Hindu, such as going to the Kumbh Mela.  Remembering ancestors, performing Shradh, calling a Pandit who chants mantras in Sanskrit at the time of funeral and if a child is born in the house, performing Mangal Sanskar according to Hindu customs, taking seven rounds of fire while reciting mantras in Sanskrit at the time of marriage.  .  In spite of doing all this, those who consider Hindu Sanskrit as dead language and Hindutva as abuse.  Yes, what would you say about them?  Those who become English by reading and writing neither go to Kumbh, nor do Shradh, nor do worship in Sanskrit on Holi-Diwali, they read American books on Hinduism and argue in vain, idiotic.  The religion in the world which considered women soulless and witch till the last century and did not give her the right to vote in a country like America, the religion which considers women only as 'farming', they are riding on this Hindu majority country and for this the most  It is more helpful that we ourselves are maintaining a loose, feudal, wealth-driven culture without that system in the name of religion i.e. Sanatan Hindutva.  Against which our religious power should have been recognized to stand up and challenge.  Can we build a new India with a ritualistic, self-confident Hindutva complaining of threats from all around, or does our Hindutva draw inspiration from the immortal sentence of Vivekananda and Dayanand's hypocritical denigration that, 'One and a half lakhs'  If I fight, then where should I call Guru Gobind?  Those who believe that we are fine because religion is with us, they do not write memorandums of complaints, but are tired of people in their 40s, 60s and 100s assimilating the new changes Chaitra Shukla 2.  Woe .  He also puts forward new things by taking risks beyond his mentality.  This would be to understand the meaning of the birth centenary of Shri Guru ji, because the same sanyasi warrior had shown the direction to realize the dream of a new orthodox society.  TJ  s .  George is right.  The danger is not from outside but from inside.  The decisive war will not be Hindu versus Vithmi but Hindu versus 'non-Hindu' Hindu.  These non-Hindu Hindus are those who consider women only as bhogya, safe or fodder.  Those big-name busted journalists also use women for their fame and popularity as a poor bait, like a piece of meat is tied to a hook to catch fish.  Ask the communist leaders who scream the most in the context of women's discourse - women do not even get a place in their politburo, the communists have used the women's issue only for market demonstration.  Sometimes the thought of giving leadership to women in Marxist organizations cannot even be thought of.  We give the examples of Margi and Maitreyi, but shy away from consecrating a woman as a co-pathagamini or a capable companion and give lectures on women from a higher platform of protection.  This is the vision of the Hindus towards the brave society of those scheduled castes and tribes, which our so called elders want to take forward with the help of 'promotion, 'protection', 'reservation'.  In two years, one such program is organized in which the matter of harmony is propagated.  But neither in our personal invitations nor in the meetings of our homes nor in our domestic worship on Teej festival, those people are included. The truth is that no matter how many explanations the logicians give about it and their hypocritical behavior.  But we have neither the people of these brave castes and tribes nor those non-Hindus with whom we want to talk and to whom we also want to explain our point of view.  I also believe in the descendants of one ancestor, but refrain from meeting and understanding. How will Hindutva with such arrogance of scholarship and false rationality stand up to the united forces of Marxism or Jihad or other outsiders?  It is that the icy sheet of this situation is breaking little by little. The light of self-churning and awakening has started spreading and the anti-national noise has also started increasing in the same amount.  It is also a proof that Rat and Hindu religion  Yay it is  You have to have the confidence that the time belongs to us.  Time will change us and not the time's permission that it should change us.  

जिसके मानने वाले सबसे ज्यादा गो हत्या करके विदेशों में उसका मास भेजते हैं , जो इतने दब्बू है कि अमरीका से दोस्ती की ग हांकते हैं और फिर तमाचा खाते हैं । ये वही हिन्दू हैं जो अपने ही मतान्तरण के लिए सुविधाएं जुटाते हैं और अपनी कम्पनियों से गैरहिन्दू संस्थाओं को हिन्दू विरोधी कार्यों के निमित्त चदा देकर खुश होते हैं । इन हिन्दुओं ने कभी अपने धर्मशास्त्र और इतिहास का अध्ययन नहीं किया पर शेक्सपीयर पढ़ा , लिंकन रटा तथा हिन्दू संस्कृति से आलोकित पूर्व एशिया को ऐसा मान लिया मानो वह मानचित्र में है ही नहीं । और फिर अपने लेखन , पुरस्कारों , जीवन शैली और शिष्टाचार को पश्चिम के खूंटे से बांध दिया । इन पश्चिमी देशों का कुत्ता भी मरे तो दिल्ली के अंग्रेजी अखबारों में खबर बनती है । पर भारतीय भाषा के किसी महान साहित्यकार और पूर्वी एशियाई देशों के बड़े नेताओं के बारे में दो पंक्तियां नहीं छापते । सोचिए , जब मुल्तान ढहा होगा या तक्षशिला लुटा होगा तो तब के हिन्दुओं में और आज के हिन्दुओं में क्या फर्क है । वैभव , ऐश्वर्य , आत्ममुग्धता और निस्सीम ज्ञान पर उतनी ही आपसी जलन , एक दूसरे को गिराने , नीचा दिखाने की अदम्य लालसा । नतीजा ? हिन्दू होने की कुछ निशानियां हो सकती हैं , जैसे कुभ मेले में जाना . पितृों का स्मरण करना , श्राद्ध करना , मरने पर अंत्येष्टि के समय संस्कृत में मंत्र बोलने वाले पंडित को बुलाना और घर में बच्चा पैदा हो तो हिन्दू रीति - रिवाज से मंगल संस्कार करना , शादी के समय संस्कृत में मंत्र पढ़वाते हुए अग्नि के सात फेरे लेना । यह सब करते हुए भी जो हिन्दू संस्कृत को मृत भाषा और हिन्दुत्व को गाली मानते । हो , उनके बारे में आप क्या कहेंगे ? पढ़ - लिखकर अंग्रेज बन जाने वाले न कुम्भ जाते हैं , न श्राद्ध करते हैं , न होली - दीवाली पर संस्कृत में पूजन वे हिन्दू धर्म पर अमरीकी किताबें पढ़ते हैं और अधकचरी , अनपदों सी बहस करते हैं । दुनिया में जिस मजहब ने स्त्री को पिछली शताब्दी तक आत्माहीन और चुड़ैल माना तथा अमरीका जैसे देश में उसे मतदान तक का अधिकार नहीं दिया , जो मजहब स्त्रियों को केवल ' खेती ' मानता है वे ही इस हिन्दू बहुल देश पर सवार हैं और इसके लिए सबसे ज्यादा मददगार है हम स्वयं हम एक लुज - पुज , सामंती , धन से संचालित संस्कृति रहित उस व्यवस्था को धर्म यानी सनातन हिन्दुत्व के नाम पर पाल - पोस रहे हैं । जिसके विरुद्ध खड़े होना और ललकारना वास्तव में हमारी धार्मिक शक्ति पहचान होनी चाहिए थी । क्या हम एक कर्मकाण्डी , चारों ओर से खतरों की शिकायत करने वाले आत्मविश्वासहीन हिन्दुत्व को लेकर नए भारत का निर्माण कर सकते हैं या हमारा हिन्दुत्व विवेकानंद और दयानंद की पाखण्ड खण्डिनी पताका लिए उस अमर वाक्य से प्रेरणा ग्रहण करता है कि , ' सवा लाख से एक लड़ाऊं , तो मैं गुरु गोबिंद कहाऊं ? जो इस बात पर विश्वास रखते हैं कि हम ठीक है क्योंकि धर्म हमारे साथ है , वे शिकायतों के ज्ञापन नहीं लिखते बल्कि नए परिवर्तनों को आत्मसात करते हुए ४० , ६० और 100 के थक चुक चुके लोगों की चैत्र शुक्ल २. वि . पा मानसिकता से परे जोखिम उठाकर भी नई बात सामने रखते हैं । यही होगा श्रीगुरु जी की जन्म शताब्दी के मर्म को समझना , क्योंकि उन्ही संन्यासी योद्धा ने नए रूढ़िविडीन समाज के स्वप्न को साकार करने की दिशा दिखाई थी । टी.जे. एस . जार्ज ठीक कहते है . खतरा बाहर से नहीं भीतर से है । निर्णायक युद्ध हिन्दू बनाम विथमी नहीं बल्कि हिन्दू विरुद्ध ' अहिन्दू ' हिन्दू होगा । ये अहिन्दू हिन्दू वे हैं जो स्त्रियों को सिर्फ भोग्या सुरक्षिता या चारा मानते हैं । वे बड़े - बड़े नामी भंडाफोड़ पत्रकार भी अपनी प्रसिद्धि और लोकप्रियता के लिए स्त्री का एक घटिया चारे की तरह से वैसा ही इस्तेमाल करते हैं जैसे मछली फंसाने के लिए कांटे में मांस का टुकड़ा बांधा जाता है । स्त्री विमर्श के सन्दर्भ में सबसे ज्यादा चीखने वाली कम्युनिस्ट नेताओं से पूछिए - उनके पोलित ब्यूरो तक में स्त्री को स्थान नहीं मिलता , कम्युनिस्टों ने स्त्री मुद्दे का सिर्फ बाजारू प्रदर्शन हेतु ' इस्तेमाल किया है । कभी किसी मुकाम पर मार्क्सवादी संगठनों में स्त्री को नेतृत्व देने की बात सोची भी नहीं जा सकती । हम मार्गी और मैत्रेयी के उदाहरण देते हैं , पर स्त्री को सह पथगामिनी या समर्थ सहचरी के रूप में प्रतिष्ठा देने से कतराते है और स्त्री के संबंध में संरक्षण के किसी बड़े ऊंचे मंच से व्याख्यान देते हैं । हिन्दुओं की यही दृष्टि उन अनुसूचित जातियों और जनजातियों के वीर समाज के प्रति है जिनको हमारे तथाकथित बड़े लोग ' प्रोत्साहन , ' संरक्षण ' , ' आरक्षण ' के सहारे आगे बढ़ाना चाहते हैं । साल दो साल में एक आध ऐसा कार्यक्रम किया जाता है जिससे समरसता की बात का प्रचार हो । पर न तो हमारे व्यक्तिगत आमंत्रणों में नहीं हमारे घरों की बैठकों में न ही हमारे तीज त्यौहार पर घरेलू पूजन में " वे लोग शामिल किए जाते हैं । सच बात यह है कि तर्क शास्त्री इसके बारे में चाहे कितनी ही सफाईयो दें और अपने पाखड पूर्ण व्यवहार को तर्क संगत सिद्ध करने में सफल होते रहे लेकिन हमारे मित्रों में तो न इन वीर जातियों और जनजातियों के लोग होते हैं न ही वे गैर हिन्दू जिनके साथ हम बातचीत भी करना चाहते हैं और जिनको हम अपनी बात समझाना भी चाहते हैं । उन्हें हम भारतीय मी कहते हैं , एक पूर्वजों की सन्तान भी मानते हैं , पर मिलने और समझने से परहेज करते हैं । ऐसी विद्वता और मिथ्या तार्किकता के अहंकार वाला हिन्दुत्व मार्क्सवाद या जिहाद या अन्य बाहरी रात्रुओं की एकजुट ताकत के सामने कैसे खड़ा हो पाएगा ? आनंद की बात यह है कि इस स्थिति की बर्फानी चादर थोड़ी थोड़ी टूट रही है । आत्म मंथन और जागरण का उजाला फैलने लगा है और उसी परिमाण में राष्ट्रीयता विरोधी शोर भी बढ़ने लगा है । उनका बढ़ता शोर भारत - भक्ति के विचार यानी हिन्दुत्व की विजय का प्रारंभिक प्रमाण है । यह इस बात का भी प्रमाण है कि रत और हिन्दू पर्याय है । यह आत्मविश्वास तो रखना ही हो कि जमाना हमसे है । वक्त हम बदलेंगे न कि वक्त की इजाजत कि वह हमे ही बदल  दे